Bending Reality: How to Make the Impossible Probable

Product Information

You will learn how to: * Bend reality by mastering two states of being that most people aren't even aware of. We’re kind of wasting our talents there and then if you can’t have the resources, do that one kind of reframe that I find very helpful is to connect your activities back again to like your purpose statement, your mission statement, your sense of values. I think this is a question that if we just ask ourselves, then we feel again, that we’re more at choice and at peace with the possible fear that might be impending and ultimately, that’s what I think allows us to navigate the unknown is the knowing that we’re safe no matter what we’re OK, no matter what, because sometimes we confuse and tangle discomfort with unsafety.

Nothing in mainstream physics that would support any of what they’d said – though somewhat begrudgingly I acknowledged that their idea of ‘energies’ did sort-of work as live-metaphor. We’re kind of relearned at an early age that any discomfort is bad, if I’m not happy, something’s wrong. Windows and doors were all closed, so no big air-movements – and anyway, air-movement would have to have been more like a howling gale to move that light, because they were big and heavy. Or, in SCAN terms, a clash between far top-left and (usually) far bottom-right of the frame – between expectations (certainties about the future) versus what’s really happening in ‘unexpected’ ways, right here, right now.If you think that, well, there must be some ordinary run-of-the-mill physical explanation, no can do – sorry. Just about all of us, I’d imagine, would expect rational decisions should be made on the basis of facts.

Doug: “By the way, I can’t personally make chandeliers move from afar, and I’m not sure I aspire to that power. So, just consider the possibility – the possibility – that it all happened just as I’ve described it. All of which response you’re likely to describe as ‘rational’ – maybe even as ‘the only rational response’.A member of our small party of travellers had left his bags in the studio reception area, and needed to pick them up before moving off homeward. She began her career as a venture capitalist investing in the fastest growing technology startups, where she got to see firsthand what the most successful entrepreneurs did differently to win. Yet, courtesy of Gooch’s Paradox, the beliefs themselves make it difficult, or even impossible, to see or acknowledge any evidence that contradicts the belief – maybe preserving us from the immediate discomfort of the mythquake, but in reality making the disconnect from reality even worse. The only facts above were that you had a bunch of second-hand information, without any first-hand in-person context of your own.

Again in SCAN terms, we can move just about any distance toward and away from the ‘point of action’ – the baseline of the frame – but we stay well over to the left-hand side. And if it is then I can find a solution that might be more attuned to what my health concern is and so it’s just kind of like a deeper asking of like, why is that person doing what they’re doing. As long as we stay to the left of that ‘boundary of effective-certainty’ – the red dotted-line – we might have some variation, but effectively we can be certain that the outcome should be what we expect.The feelings they have might be like, shame, guilt, regret, should judgment like, God, I should have known better, I should have worked harder, I need to push myself harder. To use SCAN terminology, in essence what’s happening is that you’re faced with something way out on the lower-right of the frame – real-world, real-time incident, unusual to the extent of perhaps being entirely unique, inherently unknown and probably unknowable – but you’re trying to tackle it via ‘Complicated’-domain techniques that are valid only for the upper-left of the frame – the certainty of ‘proven’ theory.

Given the probable extent of emotion used to underpin that decision-making, what does that tell you about the extent to which your nominally-‘rational’ decision-making is not actually rational at all? What Gooch’s Paradox really shows us is that a belief is a self-contained structure, continually self-confirmed and reaffirmed via circular-reasoning based a (usually) self-consistent logic: “things not only have to be seen to be believed, but also have to be believed to be seen”. It’s just if we do it unconsciously, we often bend it in a direction that we don’t want in an unfavorable way because it’s often rooted in what I was saying, Fear .

More importantly, than just feeling to the vision that you have is understanding what are the thoughts, feelings and actions that align with that vision. Then quickly, I got so passionate and excited about uncovering and rewiring so many of these beliefs and I’m now, rewired patterns and coding across all those topics I mentioned prior so whether that’s health or leadership or love, relationships, leadership, business money, every topic under the sun, I’ve gotten to look under the hood at my coding around that.